So why is my blog called

When I was diagnosed with MND, the statistics presented to the public were, to put it bluntly, awful, very technical and confusing. Did they highlight the urgency of the disease? No.

Every year, in the UK, consistently 2000 people die of MND. There has been no let up. The numbers are also rising, slightly, because of age demographics.

But there is more behind this data than meets the eye….

The bare technical numbers for our disease are that about 2 or 3 in every 100,000 of population per year develop the disease. This is known as an incidence statistic, and as I will show, it is a meaningless number, highly dangerous and should be confined to text books! It certainly should NEVER NEVER be used in the media!

Lets examine the incidence statistic…

  • This fact is a fact i.e. accurate.
  • However, does it tell the real story and is it the most powerful and appropriate figure that should be used when trying to raise awareness and seek funds for disease research? – Answer: absolutely and categorically NO.


  • What it means, is that for every 100,000 of population, every year, 2 people are diagnosed.
  • The fact is almost always incorrectly quoted and misunderstood as 2 in 100000 people will get the disease – WRONG! Take a look at Colin Pritchard’s article in the Guardian to see the mistake in action. Even professionals get it totally wrong!
  • Every year, each of us that remain unaffected still exists in the population. So our chance for a lifetime is cumulative. Tick, tick, tick…
  • In addition, your chances increase with age (there are peaks in your 50s and late 60s) – this is a staggered rise…
  • Virtually no one in their first 20 years develops the disease, but they do!
  • The population is always being fed with new born, thus lowering the yearly incidence numbers.
  • All other major diseases today are expressed as a lifetime risk and not incidence statistics.

So what is my point here?

Your lifetime risk of developing the disease most feared by healthcare professionals, i.e. the real risk of developing MND in your life, is estimated at about 1 in 300!!!!

WOW that is scary! That’s 3 children in each and every average school, sitting blissfully unaware, in the UK, that will develop the disease in their lifetime!

If you want to know more and read the detail, please read on, and if you want even more dramatic stats that emphasise the threat of this disease, skip straight to the UK Office of National Statistics section on death causes below. It’s brutal, folks!

The following peer reviewed papers provide the core evidence for the lifetime risk, and are developed from several population studies.



I first wrote this page way back in 2015 and I referred to the following ONS data for 2013 deaths.–deaths-registered-in-england-and-wales–series-dr-/2013/dr-table5-2013.xls

and 2014 deaths:

Simple analysis of these datasets showed that in 2014 the chance of a death being caused by MND was 1/278 and for deaths under the age of 75 the chance was 1 in 155!

Up to date data can now be obtained from this rather interesting explorable data link.

For 2019, the latest figures available, as of Sept 2020, the death rates are about the same, 1 in 266, with the rate under the age of 75 being 1 in 149 (slightly up on last year).

The death data is probably more indicative of the real chance of developing the disease as people are increasingly surviving cancer and heart issues etc. But, even this death rate may even hide further cases or deaths from respiratory MND as they may be recorded simply as ‘pneumonia’ and so further understating the real risk.

For those who like graphics here are the last 10 years of data showing the deaths per age group:

If you really like statistics then why not take a read of my Devil is in the detail research series? Statistics are vital in the reporting and understanding of clinical trials, but they are often very misrepresented/misquoted on social media. My latest statistics post, I thought the weather report said it would rain focuses on those numbers and charts you see spread within the results.

6 thoughts

  1. I think there are sme other powerful comparisons you can get from this data. Transport accidents killed 1849 people in 2014 while MND killed 1,810 – so your chance of being killed every year in a train crash or car crash is the same as your chance of death from MND. We will spend a forture to avoid a fatality in a train crash, but no where near as much for MND?

    In 2014 breast cancer killed 10,158 people , so a disease we really worry about and spend a lot of effort on [only] killed 6 times as many people per year as MND – so we should worry about them both.

    I also notice, as an MS sufferer myself, that MND killed about twice as many people as MS in 2014. We consider MS a moderatley common disease and everyone I meet knows someone else who has it.


    1. James, yes I agree entirely. Statistics are vital. If you look closely at funding in relation to some of these figures, it is breathtaking. Why is this? It’s awareness. When a disease is seen as rare purely because of the least appropriate stats being used, this is the result. Using lifetime stats, like cancer, really drives it home. Please share my blog. I try to make it entertaining. Lee


  2. The more I’m reading your blog, the more excellent I realise it is. Where are you based? My close friend and I are doing a series of photos of people who have a connection with MND on I’m in the West Midlands and Cristian (the pro photographer) is in Cambridgeshire. We are travelling around to get the shots and interviews. We need to get them done by beginning / mid November as Cristian is running a marathon as the climax of the campaign in late November and we are “publishing” 1 portrait a day in 26 days leading to the marathon. It would be nice to include you as an example of someone blogging their experiences and educating people. Let me know if you are interested. Thanks. Miles.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.